What Microsoft *should* Have Done With Zune

When we all first heard about Microsoft's Zune -- itdays.
sounded like a decent contender for an Apple iPodNow, If it was me. I would have even allowed Zune
competitor. Big screen, video, pictures, wireless sharingmusic to be shared with no restrictions. But I am a
of music plus rewards for people sharing music. Itcommunist.
sounded like it was to good to be true (or to good toI am also a realist. Microsoft needed to keep the
be Microsoft). It sounded like a big fat powerful idea.record labels happy. However, they could have easily
But reality and corporate trenches are a bitch. Here isdone this by restricting the sharing of Zune purchased
only some of what went wrong.music and allowing a free for all with any other media.
Pay Per Sale to UniversalI think Microsoft knew this all along, but failed at the
Despite what most thing, the decision to pay Universalnegotiations table.
for each unit sold was a relatively good strategicSetting the Price to High
move. This will force iTunes to renegotiate withIf I was Microsoft (what I believe to be a smart
potentially different terms with the Major labels. ("Ifmodern organization), I would have the knowledge that
Microsoft did it, then so can you").traditional marketing is dead. All the money they spent
However, take special note that giving Universal aon TV advertising campaigns and branding could have
piece of the pie indicated that both sides are inbeen much better spent.
agreement that there is a relatively large amount ofThey did something right with paying bloggers to speak
piracy that happens on these devices. Therefore, theZune and promote/critique it. (This, is not a paid post).
payment is basically a levy in MP3 players which goesThey should have passed the marketing savings onto
right into the labels pocket.the customers. I would have priced it quite below iPod
Wireless($50 dollars seems like a doable number minus a multi
Seth Godin has clearly demonstrated, in his book Themillion dollar advertising campaign).
Purple Cow that for a product to be popular, it must beCombined with wicked sharing functionality, this would
remarkable in some way. The wireless feature was ithave been a low market disruption that could have
for Microsoft, but here is where they botched the job.changed the world.
Here is what they should have done, since theySadly, many MP3's from SanDisk and creative seem
already agreed to pay for the piracy subsidy. It shouldto be on par with this initial Zune.
have been a free for all. Let people share everythingNo Podcast Support
that wasn't purchased from the Zune store. Let themPodcasting is essential. I use my iPod to stay updated
trade video, audio, text, ebooks, cracks, patches,with News and the going-ons of Silicon Valley. I plug in
everything. Publish an API and let people buildmy iPod, it updates my podcasts automagically, and I
applications on it. Make it every nerds dream.listen to them at the gym. I won't buy a Zune because
But they didn't did they? The reality is, they basicallyof the inconvenience of this lack of a feature.
made the wireless connection useless. Every file thatThere inability to have a backbone at the negotiations
you desire to share, regardless of whether it cametable, the pointless advertising campaign, the high cost,
from the Zune store, or your own CDs is wrapped in aand the under utilization of the wireless functionality will
very restrictive DRM which limits three plays or threebe the death of the first iteration of the Zune.