| Even if the chance that all the events coming | | | | 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 |
| together perfectly to create life on Earth is | | | | 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 |
| virtually an impossible probability with | | | | 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 |
| staggering odds (which it is), we are told by | | | | 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 |
| evolutionists that it should not matter. As | | | | 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 |
| the physicist Stenger says, "Why not? Given | | | | 0000000000000000000000000000000000 (it's |
| all possibilities, why shouldn't it have | | | | actually a much larger denominator than that |
| happened? And why not all other | | | | but those are enough zeros for my point |
| possibilities as well? Our universe was | | | | here), the "1" in the numerator is viewed as |
| formed in one of the infinite number of ways | | | | a very real possibility. It is not. That's |
| it could have formed. The particular | | | | what all the zeros mean. This is not a |
| structure of our universe came about by | | | | probability that argues what could happen but |
| chance, freezing into form just like the six | | | | rather a probability that insists upon what |
| points of a snowflake." So the evolutionist | | | | will not happen. If the odds of something |
| loads the dice with infinite universes and | | | | happening is 1 in 10, then the odds it won't |
| infinite time and that makes the | | | | is 9 in 10. Odds for, of 1 in 10000000000, |
| impossibility of life coming to be by chance | | | | means odds against are 9999999999 in |
| not a long shot, but a virtual surety. | | | | 10000000000. Extrapolate that to the larger |
| Before we permit ourselves to get too excited | | | | number in the previous paragraph to see the |
| about this "anything is possible" argument, | | | | virtual surety that the protein will not |
| let's set the ground rules. If anything is | | | | emerge by chance. From a strictly |
| possible-apples jumping off the ground and | | | | probabilistic standpoint, the chance |
| reattaching to trees, humans hatching out of | | | | emergence and evolution of life is, by any |
| chicken eggs, the desert sand turning into | | | | reasonable definition of the word, |
| ocean, life emerging from lifeless | | | | impossible. Yet this impossibility becomes |
| matter-then there can be no certainty about | | | | surety to the materialist because other |
| anything. All science would end and we would | | | | possibilities (such as intelligent design), |
| fear putting one foot in front of the other | | | | no matter how probable they may be, are just |
| because of the possibility of the floor | | | | too unpalatable. But all this play on |
| turning to quicksand or disappearing | | | | numbers and odds assumes that the |
| entirely. Yet that is not how things are, | | | | hypothetical phenomena of life emerging and |
| for you, me or the most devout of | | | | evolving are a matter of chance. They are |
| materialistic evolutionists. The philosopher | | | | not. Scientific laws make things happen in a |
| Descartes, wrestling with a similar quandary | | | | particular way, not chance. Things with mass |
| concluded, "cogito ergo sum", I think, | | | | fall to Earth, north poles attract south |
| therefore I am. That is a good starting | | | | poles, negative charges attract positive |
| point for us as well. We are real and our | | | | charges and mass and energy are never |
| thinking process is real. The way we sort | | | | destroyed, they just change places. An apple |
| real from unreal, resolve important human | | | | "could" jump to Pluto rather than fall to the |
| issues and go about day-to-day life (thinking | | | | ground and one could calculate the odds for |
| and being "I am") is by ignoring the | | | | that. But it won't happen because there is a |
| virtually impossible and banking on the | | | | law of gravity and several others that |
| probable, the reasonable and certain. By | | | | declare it won't. It's not really a matter |
| what process does a scientist partition his | | | | of odds; it's a matter of law. Now then, |
| mind such that he can one day busy himself | | | | law governs every event that could lead to |
| about in the laboratory clanging together | | | | the emergence of life and to its evolution as |
| test tubes looking for high probabilities and | | | | well, not chance. The laws of chemistry, |
| certainty, go to sleep, wake up in the | | | | physics and biology declare and demand that |
| morning and then announce to a classroom or | | | | order cannot emerge from chaos, life cannot |
| in an article that high improbabilities make | | | | emerge from non-life (law of biogenesis), and |
| certainty, i.e., life emerged by chance? By | | | | once order is present it cannot compound and |
| so doing he accepts unquestionably, as a | | | | improve upon itself (gain complexity and |
| philosophical premise, that which he would | | | | information) from chaos. Since life is |
| never excuse in others, namely that unlikely | | | | highly ordered it could not therefore have |
| events are the ones we should bank on. | | | | emerged from a chaotic primordial soup. |
| Remember, this same materialist rejects | | | | Neither could existent life have increased |
| extrasensory perception, remote viewing, | | | | complexity (evolved) and transmutated from |
| miracles, creation, foreknowledge, life after | | | | random events such as mutations. The most |
| death and the like not because they are | | | | obvious, well tested and sure of all laws in |
| impossible, but because they appear | | | | science and experience demands that order |
| improbable. Double standard? Most | | | | come from order, information from information |
| certainly. The illogic emerges from | | | | and mind from mind. Spontaneous generation |
| distorting the meaning of the math of | | | | and evolution fly directly in the face of |
| probabilities. For example, if the chance of | | | | these laws. Probabilities do not change |
| a simple protein coming into existence by | | | | that. For further reading, or for more |
| chance is 1 in | | | | information about, Dr Wysong and the Wysong |
| 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 | | | | Corporation please visit or write to . |