The Institution of Marriage versus Cohabitation

A marriage, once finalised, was a holy affair, and itthat the rules pertaining to cohabitation are unfair and
was considered a sin to break it up. In the UK, aboutmessy. It started out to reform the rules, didn't reach a
three quarters of all marriages are ending in divorce.solution after a report was published six years later,
Cohabitation seems to be gaining popularity, as theand in 2002 had started with the process again. 3.
number of couples living out of marriage hasAnnulment of the cohabitation agreement is also
skyrocketed. A survey revealed that most peopleproblematic. Any vagueness in the terms can make it
between 25 - 40 years of age no more believe innull and void in the eyes of the law, and then the
marriage as an infallible institution. In fact, a sizeablecouple would be left by themselves to keep on fighting.
portion of them have got married themselves, as theySome have likened the cohabitation agreement to a
felt it would be an appropriate gesture. Since theprenuptial deed. Both these documents are
meaning of marriage itself has changed, many socialunfortunately drawn by people who are very much in
scientists are beginning to look upon cohabitation as alove, and not thinking of moving away from each other.
form of evolved marriage. And, if we take God'sTherefore, the clauses aren't clearly mentioned and
original idea into consideration, it would be better to goproperty division is not meticulously done. 4. Children
for an arrangement where one would not part, even ifmight face a major disadvantage if a cohabitating
it means 'living in sin'. The Guardian newspaper carriedcouple splits up. It would be way more complicated if
an article about a single mom in the 1980's who hadthe man is not the biological father, or- and this is the
voiced her opinion on being a lone parent - but seemedworst case- the woman is a 'stepmom'. The
to have the same moral makeup about 'illegitimateex-spouses from previous marriages can also step in
children', 'living in sin' etc. This is a strange time foraround this time and get things royally messed up. 5.
Britain, as there are changes happening very fast, butSmall and movable property, i.e., furniture, car,
no one can afford to stand and analyse things. Thecomputer, mementos - can be the reason of the
Advantages of Cohabitation There are several pleasgreatest disputes in case a couple breaks up. Almost
on behalf of marriage against cohabitation agreements.no one bothers to enlist these articles when signing in
There are several sites on the internet which have ato a live-in relation. And making a list of them, then
lot of very sound advice to offer in this regard, as welldeciding who would own what, can be a practically
as help to draw up an agreement at a nominal cost.impossible job if they want to split. There is no proof of
Let us start out with the arguments in favour ofownership, of co-ownership, maintenance costs, and
marriage: 1. If a couple is ready to enter into adivision of expenses. The confusion created would not
cohabitation agreement, what was wrong with goodbe possible for a lawyer to solve; ultimately the couple
old marriage? They aim to have the same legal andwould have to go by themselves. 6. Inheritance is
economical effects on their life through this; they wouldanother major issue. Unless a careful and clear will is
share the same house; they would do everything in themade, and updated, the wrong people would turn out
same way - so where is the difference? If someoneto be the winners. This too is an issue where the
has a problem with the church ceremony, there isexisting laws need to be rehashed. On the Internet It is
always the option of going for a civil marriage. 2. Apossible to get the cohabitation agreement on the
cohabitation agreement is still not as useful or effectiveinternet too - there are several companies who
as a marriage. When it comes to loans and pensions,process it for a nominal cost. A couple is advised to
the complications are way more - and there is ago for it definitely before entering into an unseen
lingering doubt about every clause when it comes towedlock with each other (cohabitation?).
the property rules. The Law Society has confessed