| Much skepticism exists around the subject of | | | | just because you are performing the same |
| psychic phenomena, and this is probably not | | | | experiment! |
| a bad thing, given its rather dubious past. | | | | |
| Fake mediums, bogus mind readers, magic | | | | If, by its very nature, a experience is |
| tricks passed off as the real thing. The | | | | extremely rare and unpredictable in nature, |
| list goes on and on forever. | | | | it is very hard to use Science to say much |
| | | | about it at all. |
| Hence, the use of Science should be welcomed | | | | |
| in helping to verify some of the psychic | | | | Science has very little to say about rare and |
| community's claims. | | | | unrepeatable events. Yet, these are the very |
| | | | things that life itself is full of. The |
| However, this can also become unhealthy for | | | | Scientific Method has little or nothing to |
| several reasons, and it is equally important | | | | say regarding rare or unrepeatable events. |
| to stand guard against these flaws. They too | | | | Nevertheless, these are the very things that |
| are all too common. | | | | life itself is filled with. |
| | | | |
| (1) Biased scientists. | | | | It is for this very reason that, initially, |
| | | | the theory that a meteorite collision caused |
| The unhappy truth is that the field of | | | | the extinction of the dinosaurs was met with |
| psychic research, with only very rare | | | | hoots of laughter by the scientific |
| exceptions, fails to excite or attract the | | | | community. It was the very rarity of the |
| very scientific brains. Career-wise, the | | | | event, and the fact that no evidence could |
| field of psychic research is extremely badly | | | | be found, that caused anger and scorn to be |
| funded, is nearly impossible to make a solid, | | | | heaped upon the heads of the theory's |
| respected career in, and is the source of | | | | proponents. Until, of course, the crater was |
| endless derision from mainstream scientists | | | | discovered. |
| and diehard skeptics. | | | | |
| | | | We now also know that the role of the |
| Therefore, there is always gigantic pressure | | | | experimenter can drastically change the |
| upon paranormal investigators to justify | | | | results of the experiment. This may explain |
| their own existence. At the end of the day, | | | | why certain famed psychics seem to have their |
| they have to find something, somewhere! If, | | | | skills abandon them in the cold harsh light |
| from start to finish, their careers | | | | of the scientific laboratory. Yet, only a |
| consisted solely of disproving every single | | | | mediocre scientist would claim that because |
| psychic experience that they were presented | | | | this is the case, it proves that there were |
| with, they would quickly give up the psychic | | | | no psychic experiences to begin with! |
| research field from sheer boredom or | | | | |
| depression. After all, from a purely personal | | | | (3) Psychic Skeptics. |
| standpoint, why bother? Hence, most of them | | | | |
| are intrinsically believers to start with. | | | | This may, in part, explain the James Randi |
| To put it bluntly, the probability is high | | | | effect. This is a psychic investigator who |
| that they possess a strong in-built bias in | | | | is a total skeptic on the subject, and who |
| place. | | | | approaches the subject with this powerful |
| | | | ingrained bias. He has issued a challenge to |
| This is not to imply that they would fake | | | | pay a large sum of money to anyone who can |
| results. However, we must be aware that, by | | | | demonstrate psychic powers to him in a |
| their very existence in this much maligned | | | | scientifically controlled environment. To |
| field, there is an invisible pressure upon | | | | date, he still has his money. |
| these people to produce something to | | | | |
| validate their own existence. Hence, this | | | | Now, part of the problem may be that, even if |
| sort of science is extremely difficult to | | | | somebody is genuinely psychic, the attitude |
| maintain in a totally objective manner. | | | | of the scientist is sufficiently negative to |
| | | | completely extinguish whatever psychic |
| Regular academic scientists are always under | | | | abilities exist, as long as he is present. |
| pressure to justify their funding through | | | | Again, a true scientist of any caliber |
| their results. How much worse then for | | | | cannot discount this possibility. |
| scientists who, for the most part, have no | | | | |
| funding, and who are often the laughing | | | | This is a purely human factor we are talking |
| stock of the scientific community? | | | | about, a function of the human brain, and |
| | | | not a measurement of the boiling point of |
| For all of these reasons, the profession of | | | | water. Hence, it is entirely plausible that |
| psychic research cannot and will not attract | | | | the negative attitude of the scientist, plus |
| the very finest minds, at least not at the | | | | the undue pressure that the psychic is |
| present times. This is not intended to be an | | | | placed under as a result of it, could act to |
| insult to scientists involved in the field. | | | | diminish the very effect being measured. |
| It is just reality. The very best will tend | | | | |
| to gravitate towards "safe" fields where | | | | However, the bias of people like Randi and |
| their talent will be recognized, and not | | | | the organization of skeptics that calls |
| derided and scoffed at. | | | | itself Psicop, is worrying for another |
| | | | reason. These are people who, while claiming |
| It is a pitiful state of affairs, but that is | | | | to be scientists, are actually approaching |
| just how the world works at present. | | | | the entire subject with a deep bias that has |
| | | | nothing to do with Science whatsoever. |
| (2) The inadequacy of Science. | | | | |
| | | | They are skeptical, because they are |
| The scientific method has served humanity | | | | skeptical. That's all. They are believers in |
| extremely well, but it has its limits. It | | | | "Disbelief". It's just the opposite end of |
| cannot do everything. | | | | the spectrum of Belief. That's all. |
| | | | |
| Hence, we must be careful of trying to apply | | | | There is no scientific reason for it |
| scientific methods where they may not work | | | | whatsoever. While they pretend to be |
| well at all. Such is the manner in which | | | | scientific, their approach is more akin to a |
| science has been elevated to a religion in | | | | religious dogma; that of treating Science |
| our world, this statement might seem almost | | | | like a religion. It is often called |
| absurd. | | | | "Scientism" for this reason. |
| | | | |
| Yet, there are clear instances where science | | | | They might claim that there is no proof that |
| cannot measure anything. You cannot measure | | | | psychic phenomena exist. Yet, it can be |
| the emotions of love or anger with | | | | stated with equal validity that there is no |
| scientific instruments. Yet, few would doubt | | | | proof that they do NOT. That is a totally |
| that they exist. | | | | equivalent statement. As we have seen |
| | | | earlier, Science cannot PROVE a negative |
| You cannot use instruments to provide a | | | | statement. It can only talk about |
| printout of what somebody is thinking. Yet, | | | | probabilities and likelihood. And, as we |
| nobody would deny that they DO think, and | | | | have discussed, many psychic experiences are |
| they very often think in words. | | | | intrinsically rare or fragile in their very |
| | | | essence. |
| You cannot prove scientifically that there | | | | |
| are NO toy airplanes in orbit around the | | | | Like any good zealot, these skeptics like |
| planet Jupiter! It might sound absurd, but | | | | Randi and Psicop have a hidden agenda in |
| no matter how much you search for them and | | | | "proving" that the world functions the way |
| fail to find them, you CANNOT PROVE that | | | | they think it does. Frankly, a major |
| they are not there. You can only say that you | | | | motivation is FEAR. More people than would |
| have not found one YET, and that it is | | | | like to admit it are terrified of the |
| extremely unlikely that they exist. You | | | | possibility of psychic phenomena. What if |
| might be able to say that with 99.99999999% | | | | someone really COULD read your mind? Every |
| certainty. But you can NEVER say it with 100% | | | | dirty little secret. What if YOU too could |
| certainty. | | | | develop psychic powers? |
| | | | |
| Science cannot "prove" a negative. | | | | Just imagine what sort of world THAT would |
| | | | be! |
| Thus, in the realm of psychic experiences, | | | | |
| science cannot categorically assert that | | | | Hardly the boringly predictable, |
| there is no such thing. You CANNOT PROVE | | | | ultra-conservative, Newtonian "scientific" |
| that ghosts do not exist, for instance. You | | | | universe that these people inhabit. For them, |
| can only say that, to date, there has been | | | | it's a possibility too horrible to |
| no conclusive proof that they DO. That is | | | | contemplate. |
| NOT the same as saying that they do NOT. | | | | |
| | | | In conclusion , it's vital not to be too |
| In addition, the scientific method itself has | | | | credulous in examining a psychic |
| limitations that psychic experiences would | | | | experience, or in rushing to accept the |
| definitely stretch. In science, something | | | | claims of the "professional" investigators |
| has to be repeatable for it to have any | | | | in this field. Nevertheless, we must also be |
| validity. In other words, other scientists | | | | extremely careful of the skeptics who, while |
| have to be able to repeat your process and | | | | pretending to be scientific, are often |
| get exactly the same results. | | | | better viewed as ideological fanatics than |
| | | | even mediocre scientists. |
| However, this is almost certainly doomed to | | | | |
| failure in the psychic realm. Imagine | | | | Copyright 2006 Asoka Selvarajah. All Rights |
| repeating your experiment in a haunted house | | | | Reserved. |
| and DEMANDING that the phantom appear on cue, | | | | |