The Logic Of Existential Meaning

"When we reflect on this struggle, we may consoleaction is authentic or in bad faith. If one blames others
ourselves with the full belief, that the war of nature isfor their own action and denies responsibility that action
not incessant, that no fear is felt, that death is generallyis inauthentic or done in bad faith.
prompt, and that the vigorous, the healthy, and theThe Existentialist sees that human condition is that of
happy survive and multiply." - Charles Darwin (1).free commitment. God doesn't exist therefore
Darwin of course was unjustified in his belief; fearhumanity is in a state of abandonment with no
seems to be the most universal of emotions both fortranscending beings or priori's to guide us. Sartre
human beings and the greater animal kingdom. Thiscommits to the notion of individual freedom as the only
emotion though is not simply reserved in human life inhuman priori but denies that there is any human nature
the struggle for existence; we feel fear and anxietyas a priori because there is only a "human universality
when we make choices about the direction of ourof condition" (17). This is a sceptical argument like 'the
lives. This is our struggle for meaning. The currentsun rises every morning but how will we know if it will
piece will focus on discourses of and relevant to thatrise tomorrow' or in our case 'Man acts in certain
struggle and concepts surrounding it. Linking discoursespattens but how do we know he will tomorrow? "
diverse as logic and the Abrahamic religions to find theThus because of the uncertainty of our condition
structure of this struggle.human-beings live not only in anguish but in despair, 'if I
In 'Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus' Wittgenstein arguedtake action in support of a goal, how do I know others
that: "Propositions cannot represent the logical form:will act in support?" This means that despair is the
this mirrors itself in the propositions" (2).Thus the logicemotion that man feels because he acts without hope.
of a symbolism be it language or mathematics cannotTo summarise, the point of Sartre's existentialism is to
be found outside of that symbolism. Because the logicgive humanity its divinity as its own creator and along
of that symbolism is its very structure, its schema. Thewith this divinity its responsibility.
"propositional sign cannot be contained in itself" (3) butThere is a certain contradiction in this thought, that of a
a "sign determines a logical form only together with itsfalse objective subjective dichotomy. The actions and
logical syntactic application" (4).experiences of every particular individual never seem
Language is according to Wittgenstein a series ofto add up to the totality of what is the human
atomic propositions about the world; its symbolism is aexperience. If each individual is tied to the concept of
picture of the world, of reality and everything that isexistence precedes essence it becomes an objective
the case. The truth-argument which a propositionfact of human experience, not simply a subjective
makes is its picture of the world; the truth-value isphenomena. The Existentialists are right in saying that
determined by the ability to provide proofs for theman lives in anguish, because we have choices and
validity of the picture.responsibility for those choices. For whom he is in
Further argument put forward in the Tractatus, "Therelation to the external forces. But they are wrong to
limits of my language mean the limits of my world" (5),preclude the idea of an objective meaning of life. If
therefore in following this argument so far Wittgensteineach particular individual's life is made up of a series of
conceives a linguistic limit in our understanding of thechoices about the values to which they affirm and live
world. But he further stipulates that "For an answerfor then the root purpose of humanity in the objective
which cannot be expressed the question too cannotsense is the struggle for purpose - for our meaning.
be expressed. The riddle does not exist."(6) I.e. if youPart of this failure by the Sartrean existentialists is that
have a question there is an answer, "most questionstheir ontological inquiries were carried out under a kind
and propositions of the philosophers result from theof bad faith, under the illusion of a particular
fact that we do not understand the logic of oursemi-moralistic theory of authenticity and bad faith.
language...And so it is not to be wondered at that theTheir conceptualisation of causality in relation to the
deepest problems are really no problems" (7).individual could not touch upon the notion of conditioning
During the second part of the Tractatus, Wittgensteinor the zone of proximal development because any
turns his attention from logical symbolism and the rulessuch thing would negate individual responsibility as part
by which philosophy must separate sense fromof our nature of being. Individual agency is a
senselessness to questions about the meaning of life,component of the human condition but not to the
ethics and religious mysticism.extent envisioned by the French existentialists, death
"The world and life are one" (8), we would be mistakenfor one is normally a decisive decision but not one we
if we thought Wittgenstein felt the sense of the worldmake.
and therefore life was found inside the world and life.The inevitability of death futures highly in discourses
That the Schema of the world would be found in thesurrounding the notions of human life and it's meaning.
totality of its particulars, this logic would correlate withIn "At the Gravesite" Kierkegaard likened the nature of
the rules set out for a logical symbolism. But wedeath's influence on life to scarcity in economics. If a
cannot gain from Wittgenstein such consistency ofmerchant dumps a shipment of products at sea
logic.because the market is already saturated with a high
"The sense of the world must lie outside the world. Insupply it creates an artificial scarcity which increases
the world everything is as it is and happens as it doesthe price of the remaining product. If we did not die and
happen. In it there is no value - and if there were, itlife was infinite, then life according to Kierkegaard
would be of no value." (9)would be of little value. This adds an extra dimension
It is in this sense that Wittgenstein dissolves theto our anguish because our ability to affirm life and
question of meaning in life, opting out by two commonwhat we consider worthy values is finite and scarce.
techniques used in inadequate philosophical systems.Camus believed that this was not our first concern;
Firstly to look for life's meaning outside of life and infirstly we must concern ourselves with whether or not
conjunction with or separately neglects the internalthe value in life is valuable at all.
logic of the philosophical system to render meaningThe first question of a rational person in Camus's mind
meaningless. It is with this respect that Wittgensteinwas to be or not to be, the question of suicide. He
has similarities with both the theologian and thevery tactfully at the start of 'The Myth of Sisyphus'
absurdist, in strake contrast to his grammatical theorystated his belief that life should be lived and that suicide
of meaning.is absurd in itself, lest some unlucky soul become
The impulse of the theologian or mystic is to seekconnived of the correctness of his arguments before
otherworldly explanations for worldly questions. Karlfully completing the text. To understand Camus's ideas
Marx famously summarised this impulse as such duringwe must understand he detested being called a
the introduction of his "Critique of Hegel's philosophy of"philosopher of the absurd". Expressing his motivation
right":and in 'The Enigma' Camus wrote "Thus one becomes
"Religious suffering is the expression of real sufferinga prophet of the absurd. Yet what did I do expect
and at the same time the protest against real suffering.reason about an idea with I found in the streets of my
Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, thetime?"(18). As one understands now Camus's work
heart of a heartless world, as it is the spirit of spiritlessfunction more as a meditation and open debate then a
condition. It is the opium of the people" (10).complete system of thought. He linked 'absurd
Marx goes further to assert that "abolition of religion asreasoning' with that of Edmund Husserl's
people's illusory happiness is the demand for their realphenomenology in that it "declines to explain the world,
happiness" (11). According to this view of religion itit wants to be merely a description of actual
functions as a mere placebo-worldview, where oneexperience" (19). The Absurd is best characterised as
finds substitutive satisfaction in sacrificing this world fora mood of a nihilistic nature marred by the disunity of
the sake of the after-world. Sigmund Freud went asuniversal and particular. This disunity is the same
far to characterise religion as a mass delusion or socialobjective (universal)-subjective (particular) dichotomy
neurosis. "Neurotics" he wrote "create substitutivewhich rendered life's meaning in the existentialist
satisfaction for themselves in their symptoms, butsystems meaningless.
these either create suffering in themselves or becomeIt was an idea that captivated a generation, but unlike
sources of suffering by causing the subjects difficultiesKierkegaard they found faith deficient, not accepting it
in their relations with their surroundings and society" (12).as an answer to the question of absurdity. Like
From the angle of aesthetics, whether an individualNietzsche who found god dead upon his throne, behind
chooses to engage in such delusion is completely theirthe stone walls of heaven, Camus sought a way
own choice as western secularisation has largelybeyond the crisis of "our darkness nihilism" (20). If an
removed the state's powers of coercion in suchindividual finds absolutely no meaning in life then from
affairs. Recently, with the growth of Pentecostalismsome perspectives they should kill themselves. But
though, and other fundamentalist Christian sects, theresuicide would be an absurd answer, to choose death
have been renewed pushes to reclaim those powersis to affirm a value in absolute nihilism and thus commit
for religious application. With the aim of correctlya self-contradicting act. There is no absolute nihilism as
understanding Human life the religious view is asuch a thing is non-existent. Equally there is no eternal
misdirection of analytical focus and thus damaging inabsolute meaning like that of the Hegelian dialectic in
our pursuit of answers to our riddles.the nature of life which unifies and dictates both
In response to this Agnosticism or Atheism is theobjective and subjective meaning - there is no
application of Occam's razor, "if a sign is not'objective' standard of subjective values such a thing is
necessary then it is meaningless" (13). The existenceabsurd. Camus true to his inconsistent logic of the
or non-existence of god is irrelevant from theabsurd chose to 'rebel' against the meaninglessness by
standpoint of human life. If we engaged in theasserting his own relative value, all of course equally
entertainment of such abstractions we place ourselvesabsurd. If we are to judge Camus's conclusions I'm not
on a metaphysical treadmill, 'what comes beforesure that we could fault him. His premise was not to
alpha?' only to redefine alpha and ask the question yetexplain our nature of being in the objective sense but
again.rather actual experience, though he almost achieves it
Therefore religious faith offers up no answers for theall the same. From the stand point of understanding our
inquisitive mind. Søren Kierkegaard, a Christianontological condition as human beings, he shows the
himself, defined faith as absolute belief in the absenceabsurdity of nihilism while also the inconsistency of
of reason on the basis of the absurd. "For he whoeternal abstractions. But Absurdism misses the simple
loves god without faith reflects on himself, while theaddition of the subjective conditions into its universal
person who loves god in faith reflects on god" (14).commonality of condition, or its mega-structure.
Abraham believed in the absence of all evidence thatTo miss this mega-structure, to find the notion of life's
god would spare his Isaac upon the mount of Moriah.meaning incomprehensible is to do so upon the notion
He first sacrificed his critical capacity along with hisof its inventible incomprehensibility. In actuality we have
ethic duty to Isaac and his own emotional bond asa great body of empirical data, the annals of history
father to son. Choosing to follow his duty to god, thusand our own personal experience with which to
we have the archetype of the religious man. Oneanswer the question, what is the meaning of life? Its
surely recognises this condition in the modern suicideanswer is situated within the structure of empirical
bomber.data; the meaning of life is imbued in the very structure
On all grounds the religious impulse is a condition ofof life. It is the very struggle for purpose and the
poverty offering no answers, just resignation to anaffirmation of values, whether or not one individual
unseen father figure and a supposedly lovingagrees with another's subjective affirmations is
relationship founded upon silence. Leaving behind theirrelevant from our perspective of ontological
road to Damascus we come upon the second failinginvestigation, from objective meaning. For our nihilistic
of Wittgenstein and that of inadequate philosophicalmood we shall turn to psychoanalysis for some
systems. This is to deny the logic of a system toelucidation. According to the theory of Jacques Lacan
render meaning as meaningless. Philosophers such asduring clinical practice the patient supposes a secret
Jean-Paul Sartre and the absurdists are guilty of thisknowledge on the analyst. During the processes of
failing.analysis the subject starts to 'de-suppose' the analyst,
According to early work of Sartre consciousness isrealising they have no secret knowledge. Losing faith in
immaterial thus the rules of cause and effect thattheir dependency on the analyst they are forced to
govern in the material world have its causation chainrealise their own unconscious desire to remain
broken when an individual's volition is in play. Man is thedependent on the neurosis. The patient is therefore
embodiment of freedom, man chooses his path with aforced to recognise the place of personal agency in
free will and therefore determinism is just anpursuit of mental health. Whatever reservation one has
incoherent philosophic attitude of self-deceivers.in regards to Lacanian psychoanalysis, the concept
The anti-determinism of the existentialist leads to theirhelps to illustrate the nature of our question, that there
advocacy of subjectivism. Individuals with theiris no secret knowledge, we already know but merely
immaterial consciousness interpret objects of thehave to assert our agency to resolve the existential
intersujective world and then act upon them. Becausecrisis and the mood of absurdity. If of course that is
human action is subjective there is no objective humanwhat we want at all.
nature and no objective meaning thus life is intrinsicallyNotes:
meaningless. Subjective meaning is affirmed on life by1) "The Origin of Species" by Charles Darwin, (Penguin,
the action of the individual. Thus man's existenceLondon 1985), page 129.
precedes his essence.2) "Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus" by Ludwig
"If indeed existence precedes essence, one will neverWittgenstein, (Dover, Mineola 1999), proposition 4.121,
be able to explain one's actions by reference to apage 53.
given and specific human nature: in other words, there3) Ibid, proposition 3.332, page 42.
is no determinism- man is free, man is freedom" (15).4) Ibid, proposition 3.327, page 42.
With this in mind the Existentialist declares "I am thus5) Ibid, proposition 5.6, page 88.
responsible for myself and for all man, and I am6) Ibid, proposition 6.5, page 107.
creating a certain image of man I would have to be. In7) Ibid, proposition 4.003, page 45.
fashioning myself I fashion man".8) Ibid, proposition 5.621, page 89.
The existentialist states that because man is9) Ibid, proposition 6.41, page 105.
responsible for himself (and humanity) he is in anguish.10) "Writings of the young Marx on Philosophy and
He is in anguish because as soon as he commits toSociety" (Anchor Books, Garden City 1969), page 250.
any act he feels the responsibility for himself and11) Ibid.
humanity. The existentialist does not claim to have12) "Civilization and its Discontents" by Sigmund Freud,
moral authority over humanity his subjectivism doesn't(Penguin, Suffolk 2004), page 56.
allow objective virtue; he declares "if I regard a certain13) "Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus" by Ludwig
course of action as good, it is only I who choose toWittgenstein, (Dover, Mineola 1999), proposition 3.328,
say that it is good and not bad" (16). There is nothingpage 42.
for the existentialist to reference in the process of14) "Fear and Trembling" by Søren Kierkegaard,
choosing right or wrong; the choice falls to what he(Penguin, St Ives 2003), page 66.
can live with by being responsible for its results on him15) "Existentialism is a Humanism" by Jean-Paul Sartre,
and humanity.16) Ibid.
Humanity during the reign of terror sent alleged17) Ibid.
royalists to climb the scaffolds. Jean-Paul Marat felt his18) "Selected Essays & Notebooks" By Albert Camus,
actions were that of a philanthropist, cutting off five or(penguin Aylesbury 1979), page 144.
six hundred heads for the benefit of humanity. In the19) "The Myth of Sisyphus" by Albert Camus, (penguin
philosophical system of the Existentialist the moralAylesbury 1983), page 44.
merits of this action are neither objective nor universal.20) "Selected Essays & Notebooks" By Albert Camus,
What Sartre does judge though is whether or not the(penguin Aylesbury 1979), page 145.